Because each project is unique, constructability review fees can vary based on scope, size, and complexity. If you’d like general pricing guidance or a fixed fee proposal for a specific project, please contact us — we’ll be glad to provide more information.

Most reviews are completed within two to four weeks, depending on project size and complexity. Larger or more intricate projects — or periods of high workload — may require additional time to ensure a thorough, high-quality review.

The ideal time to begin planning for the constructability review process is early in design, typically during the Schematic Design phase. At this stage, project teams should identify which design phases will undergo review, incorporate review periods into the overall design schedule, develop preliminary cost estimates for the process, and coordinate anticipated plan delivery dates with the constructability review team.

BIM coordination and constructability review are both powerful tools for mitigating risk, reducing change orders, and improving overall project success.

BIM coordination uses the 3D model to identify and resolve physical clashes or conflicts between building systems—such as ductwork intersecting a structural beam. It is typically performed after construction documents are complete, but before construction begins.

While BIM coordination excels at detecting spatial conflicts, it does not address issues related to missing or incomplete information—for example, a missing power connection to a hand dryer. A comprehensive constructability review complements BIM coordination by evaluating drawings and specifications for construction feasibility, sequencing, detailing, and other potential challenges that may impact cost, schedule, or quality.

If a project’s budget allows for only one constructability review, the optimal timing is during the 90–95% Construction Documents (CD) or Plan Check Submittal stage. At this point, the drawings and specifications are nearly complete, enabling a comprehensive, detail-level review. It also provides the design team sufficient time to address and incorporate corrections before bidding or construction begins, minimizing potential field conflicts and cost impacts.

For larger or more complex projects, there are clear advantages to initiating the review process earlier in design to capture major coordination or scope issues sooner.

For additional guidance, please see the Review Milestones

 section.

Our review process does not include evaluating plans for code compliance or ADA-related issues. These items are typically addressed through the jurisdictional plan check and code review process, and duplicating that effort would unnecessarily increase the cost of our service.

The constructability review process is one of the most effective methods for identifying errors and omissions in plans and specifications; however, it will never eliminate all issues entirely. The effectiveness of a review largely depends on the experience of the reviewers and the thoroughness of the process—including the level of detail and time dedicated to the review.

Over the years, we have conducted several in-depth analyses measuring the impact of thorough constructability reviews. On average, our findings show a 65–70% reduction in change orders and RFIs, demonstrating the significant value of a comprehensive, detail-oriented review approach.